Tell us about a time you had to explain something complicated to someone who found it hard to understand. How did you check they had understood?
What they're testing: Plain explanation and checking understanding, which every claimant commitment depends on.
Show a strong answer to: Tell us about a time you had to explain something complicated to someone who found it hard to understand. How did you check they had understood?
As a bank cashier, I had to explain to an older customer why his card had been blocked after a fraud alert, and he was hard of hearing and anxious. I slowed down, wrote the three steps on a sheet, asked him to tell me back what he would do, and he sorted it the same day.
He had been told by phone that his card was blocked and had come in convinced his money had been stolen. My usual explanation used words like verification and authorisation, and I could see I was losing him. So I moved to a quieter desk, faced him so he could see my mouth, and said, 'Your money is safe. The bank stopped a payment it wasn't sure about. There are three things to do.' I wrote them as short numbered steps in large print. Then, instead of asking 'Does that make sense?', which people always say yes to, I asked, 'Can you tell me what you'll do when you get home?' He mixed up two steps, so I went through those again. He came back that afternoon to say it was working. Since then I always ask people to explain it back. I learned that the check is the important part: until someone can tell you what happens next, you have not explained it.