Police Officer Interview Questions and Answers (2026)

Updated 2 October 2026 by Ben Gallagher. Sources below.

The College of Policing's online assessment does not test what you know about policing. Its interview asks how you have dealt with situations in the past, with examples from your work and your personal life, and its briefing exercise puts you in the role of a constable dealing with issues from the information you are given. So most questions below ask for a real example of courage, respect and empathy, public service, taking ownership, emotional awareness or careful thinking, and the last group practises the briefing exercise. Prepare one strong example for each, and say what you did, why, and what happened.

Try these questions free

Try it for free

These are common questions for this job, but your panel will also ask about you. Sign up for free to get questions personalised to your interview, written from the job advert and your CV.

Courage: doing the right thing when it is hard

Tell us about a time you challenged someone's behaviour because you felt it was wrong, when it would have been easier to say nothing.

What they're testing: Courage: standing up to behaviour that falls short, even with people you know.

Practise this questionTry it yourself first, then compare.
Show a strong answer to: Tell us about a time you challenged someone's behaviour because you felt it was wrong, when it would have been easier to say nothing.

At the pub where I worked, a regular kept making comments about a young bar worker's appearance, and the rest of the staff laughed along. I told him calmly that it had to stop, and then I told the manager. It was awkward, but she told me later she had been dreading his visits for months.

I was the supervisor on Friday nights. This regular spent a lot of money, so when he commented on how our newest bar worker looked, people laughed it off. She was 18 and on my shift, so I felt it was my job to deal with it. The next time he did it, I went over and said quietly, 'I need you to stop commenting on how the staff look. It makes people uncomfortable, and it won't carry on here.' He said it was only banter. I said I believed he meant no harm, but the answer was still no. Then I checked she was all right, wrote down what had happened and told the manager the next morning, because I did not want it to depend on who was on shift. The manager spoke to him and he stopped. I learned that saying something early, calmly and in private is far easier than letting it build up.

Describe a time you made a decision you knew some people would not like. How did you explain it, and how did you stand by it?

What they're testing: Making a decision, explaining it and being accountable for it.

Practise this questionTry it yourself first, then compare.
Show a strong answer to: Describe a time you made a decision you knew some people would not like. How did you explain it, and how did you stand by it?

As a volunteer coordinator at a food bank, I decided we would stop letting people collect parcels for others without that person's referral, because some families were going without. Several volunteers were unhappy. I explained why at the next meeting, listened to them, and kept to the decision, with one change they suggested.

Our stock was running out early on some days. When I looked at the records, a few people were collecting several parcels a week for others, and we had no way of knowing whether those parcels reached anyone, while families with referrals were being turned away. I ran the Tuesday sessions, so I proposed that a collection for someone else needed that person's own referral. Some volunteers felt it was unkind, and one said I was treating people like suspects. At the meeting I showed the numbers, said I understood the worry, and asked how we could make it fair. One volunteer suggested a short list of housebound people who could name someone to collect for them, and I agreed. I wrote the rule down, explained it at the door myself for the first few weeks and took the complaints rather than leaving them to others. After two months we stopped running out, and the volunteer who had disagreed told me the list had been a good idea.

Tell us about a time someone asked you to bend a rule or cut a corner. What did you do, and what happened next?

What they're testing: Integrity under pressure from a colleague, a customer or a friend.

Respect and empathy

Tell us about a time you had to understand the point of view of someone very different from you. How did you find out what mattered to them?

What they're testing: Listening to understand people whose views, background or situation differ from yours.

Describe a time you helped someone who was upset or angry. What did you say, and how did you know it was working?

What they're testing: Empathy and calm communication with someone in distress.

Practise this questionTry it yourself first, then compare.
Show a strong answer to: Describe a time you helped someone who was upset or angry. What did you say, and how did you know it was working?

In my job at a council call centre, a man rang in tears because his late mother's council tax bill had been sent to him with a court warning. I let him talk, said I was sorry, told him exactly what I would do, and rang him back that afternoon as I had promised.

He was shouting at first, mostly about being treated like a criminal. I did not interrupt or start explaining the process. When he paused, I said, 'I'm so sorry about your mum. Let me see what's happened.' I could hear him slow down. The account had not been updated after her death, so the reminder had gone out automatically. I told him I could not cancel it myself, but I would send it to the team that could, mark it urgent and ring him back by four o'clock. I did that, and the team put the account on hold. When I rang back, he apologised for shouting, and I said there was no need. I knew it was working when he stopped repeating himself and started asking questions. Afterwards I suggested a check for accounts where a death had been reported, and my team leader added it to our call notes.

Tell us about a time you noticed someone being treated unfairly or left out. What did you do about it?

What they're testing: Fairness and respect, and acting when someone is excluded.

Tell us about a time you realised you had judged someone too quickly. What made you see it, and what did you do differently?

What they're testing: Recognising your own assumptions so that decisions stay fair.

Public service

Describe a time you provided a service to someone that went beyond what was required. What was the effect on them, and what did you learn about what the public need?

What they're testing: Public service in practice: responding to individual needs and reflecting on impact.

Tell us about a time you made a commitment to someone and it became hard to keep. What did you do?

What they're testing: Building trust by keeping your word, or being honest when you cannot.

Tell us about a time you noticed that someone was vulnerable or at risk and made sure they got help.

What they're testing: Spotting vulnerability and acting on it rather than leaving it to someone else.

Taking ownership

Tell us about a mistake you made that affected someone else. What did you do once you realised, and what changed?

What they're testing: Taking ownership and learning without defensiveness.

Practise this questionTry it yourself first, then compare.
Show a strong answer to: Tell us about a mistake you made that affected someone else. What did you do once you realised, and what changed?

Choose a real mistake, say what happened and what it cost someone, say how I told the people affected, and what I changed. The panel is looking for ownership and learning, not for a mistake that was secretly a strength.

While volunteering at a youth club, I wrote down a parent's phone number incorrectly, and a mother did not get a message about her son being unwell. He waited for an hour before another leader noticed. When I realised, I told the club manager straight away and rang the mother to apologise and explain what had happened. She was upset, which I understood. I did not make excuses. I asked the manager how we could prevent it happening again, and we agreed that numbers would be read back and checked at registration. I also made a point of checking the contact sheet for any other mistakes I had made, and found one more, which I corrected. The mother later thanked me for being honest. It taught me to check details back and to tell people straight away when I've got something wrong.

Describe a time something went wrong that was not your job to fix, and you dealt with it anyway. What did you do, and who did you tell?

What they're testing: Taking responsibility for a problem and seeing it through.

Tell us about a time you were given feedback you did not expect about how you treat people. What did you do with it?

What they're testing: Owning your development and acting on criticism.

Emotional awareness and working with others

Tell us about a time you had to stay calm and keep going when you felt stressed or upset. How did you manage your own reaction?

What they're testing: Emotional awareness: noticing and managing your own feelings under pressure.

Practise this questionTry it yourself first, then compare.
Show a strong answer to: Tell us about a time you had to stay calm and keep going when you felt stressed or upset. How did you manage your own reaction?

When I worked nights at a care home, a resident fell and cut her head while I was the only carer on that floor. I felt my heart racing, so I took a breath, told myself the next step, pressed the call bell and stayed with her. Afterwards I talked it through with my senior.

She was confused and frightened, and there was blood on the floor, which made it look worse than it was. My first feeling was panic, and I noticed it. I said to myself, 'Call, then comfort.' I pressed the bell for the nurse, knelt beside her, told her my name and that help was coming, and held a clean pad to the cut as I had been trained. I kept my voice slow because she was copying my breathing. The nurse arrived within a couple of minutes and took over. After the shift I felt shaky and wanted to go straight home, but I asked my senior if we could talk it through. She said I had done the right things, and pointed out that I had forgotten to note the time of the fall, which I now always do. I learned that I can feel scared and still act calmly, and that talking it through afterwards gets me ready for the next one.

Describe a time you worked with people who disagreed about how to do something. What part did you play in getting it done?

What they're testing: Collaborating through disagreement towards a shared result.

Tell us about a time you noticed that someone you worked or studied with was struggling. What did you do?

What they're testing: Awareness of other people's wellbeing and doing something about it.

Analysing critically and being open-minded

Tell us about a time you had to make sense of information that was incomplete or did not add up before you could act. How did you decide what to do?

What they're testing: Analysing critically: weighing information, spotting gaps and avoiding early conclusions.

Practise this questionTry it yourself first, then compare.
Show a strong answer to: Tell us about a time you had to make sense of information that was incomplete or did not add up before you could act. How did you decide what to do?

As a supermarket shift leader, I had a customer saying a new cashier had given her £20 too little change, and a cashier who was sure she had not. Instead of taking a side, I counted the till, which was £20 over, and checked the camera. The customer was right, so I refunded her and supported the cashier.

The customer was angry and there was a queue, so the easy thing would have been to hand her the money to make it go away, or to back my colleague. Neither felt right without knowing what had happened. I asked the customer to wait for five minutes and explained why. I closed the till and counted it with the cashier, and it was £20 over. I then checked the camera with the duty manager and could see the cashier taking change from the wrong section of the drawer. I went back, apologised, gave the customer her £20 and thanked her for waiting. With the cashier, I kept it private, said it was an easy mistake on a busy shift and showed her how to count change back. Afterwards I suggested pairing new cashiers on Saturdays for their first month, which the manager agreed to. I learned to check the facts before I react, even when people want an answer straight away.

Tell us about a time you spotted a better way of doing something. How did you test it and who did you convince?

What they're testing: Being innovative, with evidence, and persuading others.

Describe a time a plan or a way of working changed and you had to adapt quickly. What did you do?

What they're testing: Being open-minded and adapting when things change.

Briefing exercise practice: dealing with an issue as a constable

Residents say a group of teenagers gathers outside a corner shop every evening and older neighbours feel unsafe, while the shopkeeper says the teenagers are good customers. As the local constable, what are the issues, and what would you do first?

What they're testing: Briefing exercise style: seeing every side of an issue and building positive relationships.

Practise this questionTry it yourself first, then compare.
Show a strong answer to: Residents say a group of teenagers gathers outside a corner shop every evening and older neighbours feel unsafe, while the shopkeeper says the teenagers are good customers. As the local constable, what are the issues, and what would you do first?

There are three groups with real concerns: older residents who feel unsafe, teenagers who may have nowhere else to go, and a shopkeeper who needs both as customers. I would not assume the teenagers are doing anything wrong. First I would find out what is actually happening, by talking to each group myself.

I would start by naming the issues. Some residents feel unsafe, which matters even if nothing criminal is happening. The teenagers may feel they are being blamed for being young. The shopkeeper is caught in the middle. I would go to the shop at the time the group meets and talk to the teenagers in a friendly way, to find out who they are and why they meet there. I would visit some of the residents who complained and ask what exactly worries them, because feeling unsafe could mean noise, or something more serious. I would ask the shopkeeper what he sees. Then I would look for something that works for everyone, for example asking the teenagers to keep the noise down later in the evening, or talking to local youth services about somewhere for them to go. I would go back to the residents to tell them what I had done, and keep checking. If I found that someone was being threatened, their safety would come first.

A community meeting is angry about a recent incident and some people are blaming the police. What do you say, and how do you want them to feel when they leave?

What they're testing: Briefing exercise style: listening, openness and rebuilding trust without being defensive.

Practise this questionTry it yourself first, then compare.
Show a strong answer to: A community meeting is angry about a recent incident and some people are blaming the police. What do you say, and how do you want them to feel when they leave?

Listen first. Acknowledge their anger without being defensive, say what I know and don't know, explain what is being done, and agree how they will hear back. I want them to leave feeling heard and knowing who to contact, even if they disagree with us.

I would begin by saying, 'Thank you for coming. I can hear how angry people are, and I want to listen.' I would let people speak, note their points on a flipchart, and not interrupt or argue, even when some comments were unfair. When someone blamed the police, I would say, 'I understand why you feel that, and I'm sorry that you feel let down.' Then I would explain what I could: what the investigation was doing, what I could not share and why. I would commit to something I could deliver, such as a named contact and an update by a set date. After the meeting I would speak to people individually who wanted to. I would want people to feel that someone had listened, that I was honest about what I did not know, and that I would do what I said.

You have planned extra patrols near a park after complaints about bikes. New information shows the complaints come mostly from one street, where an older resident was knocked over last week. How does this change your plan?

What they're testing: Briefing exercise style: changing your plan when new information arrives and thinking about who is at risk.

You are called to a man shouting in the street who says people are following him. He is not committing an offence. How do you approach him?

What they're testing: Briefing exercise style: empathy, calm and safety with a person in distress.

Practise this questionTry it yourself first, then compare.
Show a strong answer to: You are called to a man shouting in the street who says people are following him. He is not committing an offence. How do you approach him?

Treat him as a person in distress, not a suspect. Stay at a safe distance, speak calmly, introduce myself, listen to what he says without arguing, and check for danger to him or others. If he needs help, I would involve health services, rather than leave him or use force.

I would stop at a safe distance and say, 'Hello, my name's Sam. I'm from the police. I'm here to see if you're okay.' I would keep my voice level, avoid sudden movements and let him speak. If he said people were following him, I would not argue or say it was not true, but say that I could hear he felt frightened and I wanted to help. I would look for signs of risk: whether he had hurt himself, whether he had taken anything, whether he was safe near the road. If he agreed, I would ask him to wait with me while I called for support, such as the mental health team or an ambulance, and I would stay with him. I would pass on what I'd seen and heard to the services, and record it, so he did not have to explain it all again.

How you are assessed

The College of Policing's candidate guide for its online assessment process (version 3.2, September 2024) says that the process for initial police recruitment consists of a competency-based interview, a written exercise and a briefing exercise, and that you are assessed against the competencies and values in the competency and values framework (CVF), with the competency criteria set at level 1. It says you do not need prior knowledge of policing. The interview has five questions about how you have dealt with situations in the past, with one minute to think and five minutes to record each answer. In the written exercise you act as a constable completing an urgent task for your line manager from four items of information, and spelling and grammar are not assessed. In the briefing exercise you answer spoken questions in three parts of four questions each, with a minute to think and three minutes to speak.

Both the guide and a separate 2026 description of the process say that prepared notes or scripts must not be used and can lead to automatic failure. Forces run the process, so check your force's instructions, because details such as timings can change between versions.

The competency and values framework

The College of Policing's 2024 framework replaced the 2016 version and gave forces until 1 May 2025 to move to it. It has three values: courage, respect and empathy, and public service, and six competencies: we are emotionally aware, we take ownership, we collaborate, we support and inspire, we analyse critically, and we are innovative and open-minded. Each competency has three levels, from practitioner to senior manager.

The framework describes courage as making, communicating and being accountable for decisions and standing against anything that could bring the profession into disrepute, and respect and empathy as listening to and understanding the views of others and responding to the challenges people face. Public service means working in the public interest, fostering public trust and taking pride in an excellent service. Older material, including the College's 2024 candidate guide, still uses the earlier labels of integrity, transparency, impartiality and public service, so expect to see both in preparation material.

Standards of behaviour, and how to prepare your examples

The College of Policing published a new Code of Ethics in 2024 to replace the 2014 code. A City of London Police report describes its ethical policing principles as courage, respect and empathy, and public service, supported by guidance on ethical and professional behaviour. The standards officers are held to are set separately, in the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020. Schedule 2 lists ten, including honesty and integrity, discreditable conduct, and challenging and reporting improper conduct, which says officers report, challenge or take action against the conduct of colleagues which has fallen below the standards. You are not tested on any of this, but it explains why panels listen for honesty and for people who speak up.

For the interview, the College's guide suggests the STAR method: briefly describe the situation and what you had to do, then the action, which it calls the main part of your answer, then the result and what you learned. It suggests giving one example for each question in detail rather than several. Both the guide and State6 say your examples can come from your work or your personal life, so think about jobs, study, volunteering, sport and family, and pick moments where you had to choose what to do. In the briefing exercise, the guide asks you to use only the information you are given, and to think about how the police can build positive relationships.

What the panel scores

  • Courage: you challenge or report poor behaviour and tell the truth about your own mistakes.
  • Respect and empathy: you listen, treat people with dignity and recognise your own bias.
  • Public service: you put the public's safety and needs first and follow up.
  • Ownership: you take responsibility, decide and explain your decisions.
  • Collaboration: you work with colleagues and partners and look after their wellbeing.
  • Critical thinking: you weigh information, spot gaps and use evidence.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Answering with what you think police officers do, instead of what you did in a real situation.
  • Choosing an example where you were part of a group and not saying what you did yourself.
  • Giving several short examples instead of one in depth, which the College's guide advises against.
  • Using a script or prepared notes, which the College's guide says can lead to automatic failure.
  • Bringing in law or procedure in the briefing exercise instead of using the information you are given.
  • Stopping at what you did and leaving out what happened and what you learned.

Questions about the interview

Do I need to know the law to pass the police assessment?

No. The College of Policing says you do not need prior knowledge of policing or the police role to complete the online assessment exercises. You are assessed on your behaviour and judgement. Training teaches the law.

What are the police competencies and values?

The College of Policing's 2024 framework has three values, courage, respect and empathy, and public service, and six competencies including taking ownership, analysing critically and being emotionally aware. Older material uses earlier labels, so read your force's instructions.

Can I use notes in the assessment?

The College's candidate guide says you must not use prepared notes or scripts, and that evidence of this may result in automatic failure. Practise answering aloud without a script instead.

What is the briefing exercise?

You take the role of a constable dealing with an issue set out in preparation material, then answer questions out loud in three parts, with new information in the later parts. The College's guide asks you to use only the information you are given.

How should I structure my answers?

The College's guide suggests the STAR method: situation, task, action and result, and recommends giving one example in depth rather than several briefly. Spend most of your time on what you did.

Sources

Related topics: Behavioral interview questions, Common interview questions.

Related: Prison officer, Firefighter, Work coach, Probation officer.